?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

reneekytokorpi's comment in a previous thread made me think. In particular:
This is so helpful, and I'm very grateful that you're sharing. While I'm not familiar with Asperger's or Autism, my family struggles with my brother's Kleinfelter's and your insights are helping me explain things in new ways. They're not related disorders, but the coping skills and ways you approached things give us fresh things to try to clear up confusion. Thank you!


Coupled with my oldest son's eighteenth birthday, made me thoughtful.


Before I start -- or before I continue -- I want to make one thing absolutely clear, in case I haven't, or in case it's not: Parenting is a process unique to the individuals involved. Our parenting decisions, between the two children, differ because the two children are different. When I speak definitively, I can -- because I'm speaking about my experiences with my oldest son. I'm so enormously happy and grateful that people find some of these posts useful -- and the best part is when people pick elements of my experience that resonate with their own, even if on the surface their situations are very different.

Even between two ASD children, there are going to be personality differences. My oldest son is vastly more oppositional when upset than some of the ASD children I've met, who were compliant, peaceful, and able to bled into a normative classroom, with only some marked difficulties of development, and a distinct disinterest in any socialization whatsoever. Definitive about my son? Yes, I can be (sometimes). But I can't be definitive about your son. Or daughter. Or husband, wife, brother, sister, parents or self.

I've wanted to write about my experiences with my son for years, in part because I thought people with similar children would find it helpful -- not even because they'd agree with what I'd written, but because it might make them feel less isolated. I've been really surprised at the variety of responses these posts have received because many of you don't have children, and don't want them, and I never imagined that these posts would speak to you. (I did, in fact, assume that the number of readers of this LJ would drop because I wasn't writing about writing, publishing or business.)

But: I'm not an expert. I can answer questions, or try, but my answers come from very specific experience and the inherent ability to over-focus.

Before my oldest son was born, we'd read books about parenting and early childhood development. A lot of books, actually, the numbers increasing as the pregnancy drew to its natural close. We'd talked to other parents (or we'd been talked at). I'd discussed the possible effects of a newborn on my ability to write, to get work done. Not getting work done was not an option for our household. (I did assume that somehow it would be easy to find the time to write, because babies were supposed to sleep all the time. This caused my writing friends with children to laugh hysterically.)

As anyone who's had a child knows, speaking about the experience differs radically from the experience itself. Looking at an orange, understanding how it grows, how it's picked, and how it's shipped to your store is not in any way the act of eating one. Nor, in fact, is knowing precisely how it's digested and how the digested bits enter the bloodstream. You can amass a wealth of knowledge - but it's the knowledge of other people, who've had children who are not yours. (Not that this knowledge is useless; it's not. But it's never clear how the knowledge will be useful in your particular case until it suddenly becomes relevant).

Neither my husband nor I are terribly comfortable with an overtly authoritarian model of parenting -- while understanding, at the same time, that the authority in the household rests in our hands. We've always tended to approach any difficulties we had as logically as possible, which makes for interesting arguments. Having read and absorbed a number of different books, we survived three months of almost no sleep that wasn't broken hourly, all the while observing our child and looking for the usual developmental signs. We didn't assume that we knew who our son was, but assumed that we could figure it out as we went along. My mother frequently found our discussions annoying, because we didn't see things quite the way she did; she was, and is, a little more sentimental in her reactions.

We assumed that many of the differences between our son and textbook babies were due to personality and preference on his part; this was, in part wrong and in part right. Like any parents, we grew to understand when he was upset, and to figure out by trial and error what had upset him. It's why I could guess what had happened in MSI; I knew how he reacted when he thought something very unfair had occurred. In the context of our house, we had the flexibility to rearrange our routines; in the confines of a classroom, a teacher has to deal with at least twenty-five other small children. At age four there's a wide range of development; at six, the same is true.

So we understand that normative, conforming behaviour -- behaviour that every child in the class was expected to follow -- was a necessity for the classroom. It was not, of course, a necessity in the same way in the home. (I don't think it should be. Home is not school, and it's my assumption that most children, like most adults, know the difference after a short exposure).

What we learned with our son -- long before he himself could explain it -- was that as long as there were explicable, logical reasons for our decisions or household rules, he accepted them. So pretty much everything came with explanations. Don't play in the road/on the top of the slide/at the top of the stairs were all very easy.

Taking antibiotics was a three day war. He was young enough at the time that he didn't understand that he had a pretty bad infection, and the medication was not to his liking. We could not explain why he had to take them; only on day three did he understand that if he did, we would stop bothering him. You could see the light bulb go off, but the days that preceded it were torture.

Hats in Summer? He eventually learned that if he dropped them someplace really inconvenient (like, say, into the subway tracks), we couldn't get them back. Winter coats? Why, yes -- if he was cold. We got into the habit, from the time he was months old, of walking outside with him, sans coat, before we tried to put a baby snowsuit on him. This got us the dirtiest looks ever from all the other little old Greek ladies in the neighborhood, and a fair number of mothers who didn't know my son. IF it was cold, he let us put him in a coat. If it wasn't -- well. My mother thought this was a bit odd, but the five seconds on the porch made actually dressing him simple. So in situations like this we looked for nonverbal explanations -- and enduring the dirty looks.

But he knew what the rules were, at home. If the rules at school differed and we could explain the reasons for them, he accepted them. There were some rules, however, that were more complicated, and they therefore seemed very arbitrary to him. These he found difficult.

Food, I've mentioned elsewhere. My mother once tried to feed him lunch while she was babysitting, and he would not eat because he wanted chocolate. So, that lunch was a disaster. I came home, she explained what happened, and asked what she should have done. I said, "let him have a piece of chocolate." She didn't approve, because she assumed that it would spoil his appetite; I pointed out that he clearly didn't have enough of one since he'd skipped lunch entirely. But I also pointed out that he never ate much of anything, and if she gave him a piece of chocolate or two he wasn't likely to want more.

The next time this came up was the next time she was babysitting him, and this time, she let him have a piece of chocolate. To her surprise, he then ate lunch. He didn't, in fact, want nothing but chocolate. Sadly, he never wanted great amounts of any one food; she had assumed that he would just eat junk if he had that option.

However...in retrospect, I think what he wanted was some say in his own life. Or that he wanted his desires to be acknowledged. This is a pretty normal, human desire. He was always much happier to cooperate if there was some sense of compromise. This made sense to me. It did not make sense to some of the other parents. But my son didn't ask for much. And frankly, I want some say over my own life. I think it's a basic human desire. He did not insist on, say, playing in the road. He understood why this was a bad idea. He believed my explanation. Nor did he insist on any number of things I thought might be dangerous. He didn't insist that he had the right to grab someone else's toy, etc. This wasn't the type of control he attempted to exert.

But he did make a stand about things that weren't a danger to him; about things that weren't at the core of household rules. The chocolate would be one example of that. Changing playtime activities (he hated changes of state, even as a crawling infant) were another. If we gave him the fifteen minute warning (we're leaving in 15 minutes) and followed it up at the ten minute and five minute mark, he was quiet as a lamb. If we said "we're leaving now" with no warning, we wouldn't be able to leave for fifteen minutes anyway -- and then, only after a meltdown. It required a bit of forethought or planning on our part, but because it worked, that's what we did.

We were willing to make those compromises; some people advised -- strongly -- against it. And in the cases of their own children, they may well have been right. In the case of mine, it would have started a series of fights that would serve no purpose. "It is our personal preference that you stop this" wasn't enough of a reason to put our foot down. Even if we looked down the road and thought it was important to curb some of his interests (in computers, for example), we had to be careful.

But because we chose our fights and we compromised where the stakes weren't high enough, he accepted the more inflexible, easily explained rules (see: don't play in the road). He was comfortable in his own home, an environment in which he felt, if not in complete control, than not disregarded.

Having seen other children, I realize that this is not an approach that would work for everyone. When I say my son didn't ask for much, what I really mean is over the course of the first twelve years of his life, he asked for three things. A $469.00 tricycle (which at the time we so could not afford; I told him this apologetically, and he accepted it), Souls in the System (a computer game) and Doom II (my husband was not a fan of this, but Doom I had already arrived in our house via a demo disk, and he could not think of a clear and rational reason to say no to its sequel, although he spent three days trying to come up with one). That's it.

I've seen small children ask for literally a dozen things in the space of three hours. If he had been one of them, we would have then set up an incentive system, like a pre-allowance (we'd discussed this, expecting that he would ask for things as he got older). Having said this? I knew that he wanted Beyblades because he watched the other kids play with them prior to and after school. He didn't have to ask -- we bought them. It was one of the few early activities he shared with peers, and he stayed at school until the last child who also played with Beyblades left.

His interest in beyblades disappeared when the other kids stopped playing with them, though. Aspergers is hard because it doesn't mean the child has no interest in playing with other kids - he just doesn't have all the necessary tools.

None of the children his age were allowed to play on computers. Their parents were surprised that we allowed our son to do so. But we either had to stop using computers recreationally ourselves or allow him to do so. We couldn't do the thing that we were forbidding him, because we couldn't make it make sense. Driving a car? Yes. His feet couldn't reach the pedals and he couldn't see over the dashboard (and it was illegal, but at a certain age, he didn't understand what that meant). He understood all the ways in which this could be bad. Using a computer? No. The only way to make that stick in our house, as I said, was for all of us to stop. I am not mother enough to give up that time.

There are things I did give up. There were times I felt enormously guilty for the things I didn't.

But for my son, I think the single most effective thing we did was to allow him some say in the elements of his life that weren't defined by safety concerns, and by being consistent about things (like the computer time or games) across the house.

It's my belief, having watched him for so many years, that the reason he functioned in a house that was not set up with a very strict, daily routine (which is frequently recommended for ASD children) is because he could substitute a sense of control or say in his environment with perturbations in routine. Let me try that again. Because he had some choice, knowing, in advance, what would happen was less important. He substituted control for knowledge.

I think in the case where routine is essential to function, the same is true in the inverse: children who cannot make generalizations about social rules, or in fact, any rules in the worst case, will substitute knowledge of what will happen for the safety of control.

Let me make clear that certain elements - chocolate before lunch, rather than after - were not considered 'normal' behaviour. An argument--a cogent one--can be made that it's especially important for ASD children to acquire normal and normative behaviours. I believe they can - but I also believe that, developmentally, they're often behind the curve, and the cost of enforcing behaviours that make no sense to the child is paid in the child's insecurity and uncertainty. At some point, "people might/will think this is strange" made sense to my son - and it became incentive to alter his behaviour. But not, unfortunately, at four, five or six years of age.

Some ASD children, on the other hand, take well to more normative behaviour and corrections almost immediately in my direct experience. This was, as usual, a "does it work" decision, weighing the long-term costs and benefits for and to our son as we perceived them.

I'm sorry about the constant interruptions, here. I have a whole new set of page proofs (but they are small, compared to the beginning of the month's novel's worth), but I am halfway through the exit interview of grade one, and looking toward grade two.

Comments

( 14 comments — Leave a comment )
la_marquise_de_
Jun. 13th, 2011 10:07 pm (UTC)
It seems to me that the rules and compromises you made were both sensible and constructive -- and it's noticeable that the things like chocolate before lunch are breaches only of pretty minor conventions.
A friend with a hugely energetic and imaginative toddler had to insist on the rule 'no roller skates on the climbing frame'. Her son needed that boundary. Other mothers thought she was 'putting ideas in his head', but she wasn't. She knew what he might come up with and had taught herself to look at everything the way he might.
serge_lj
Jun. 14th, 2011 12:11 am (UTC)
One of the last conversations I had with my dad was about when I was born, and how scared he was about doing a good job raising me.
mtlawson
Jun. 14th, 2011 01:32 am (UTC)
But we either had to stop using computers recreationally ourselves or allow him to do so.

That reminds me of what we gave up when our son was diagnosed with a peanut allergy. I wasn't sad to see peanut butter go --I was sick to death of peanut butter at the time as I'd had it for over a decade as a school lunch-- but I missed the other items. (And now I actually find myself missing peanut butter; I guess a decade of being away from the stuff will do that to you.) And now, if I'm out and I know that I won't be in contact with my son for several hours, I'm still reluctant to eat at a restaurant where I'll come into contact with peanuts, like Thai.

Early on, I recognized that if I remained consistent in this, he would understand and not try to push the boundaries so much.

Getting him to wear his Epipen everywhere is more of a struggle, however; more akin to last Sunday, when I took the three kids to go hike one of the trails at a local park. When we pulled up and I turned around, he didn't have his Epipen with him. "What do you think is going to happen anyway?" he demanded. "There isn't going to be some giant peanut coming out of the woods after me."

I'm sure that made sense to him, but it never occurred to his ten year old mind that other people we might meet on the trail might have GORP on them, or that they might have brought peanuts to feed a random squirrel or two.
msagara
Jun. 15th, 2011 02:24 am (UTC)
I'm sure that made sense to him, but it never occurred to his ten year old mind that other people we might meet on the trail might have GORP on them, or that they might have brought peanuts to feed a random squirrel or two.

I think it must get harder and harder as he gets older, because obviously nothing bad ever happens, and children often know that we're overly proficient at worry =/.
mtlawson
Jun. 15th, 2011 03:40 am (UTC)
Well, we've hit on him innumerable times that all it takes is once.

When he was going to go visit a neighbor's house the other day, I told him to get his Epipen. "How do you think you'll get to it if you have a reaction?" I asked him.

"I'd just run back," he replied.

"Not if you can't breathe. You can run now because you can. If you can't, an easy run is a nightmare. Just ask your sister with asthma."
comrade_cat
Jun. 14th, 2011 03:33 am (UTC)
I am happy you have a new novel, and I am happy you are posting these! I am one of the readers who don't want children, but I am fascinated by ASD and just loved a well written analysis of most anything anyway. Human beings are interesting to understand (with the understanding that understanding is a process!).

I also mentor a teenager, so random little bits about parenting are helpful in that way.
green_knight
Jun. 14th, 2011 04:02 pm (UTC)
While the situations themselves are unique, I am utterly fascinated by hearing you talk about _how you solved them_. And I think that giving a child the security that _they will be heard_ is probably essential to parenting (though different parent/child combinations might express this differently) - there are so many ways in which a child does not have control, that it helps tremendously to be consulted where it *is* possible (and that includes 'here's your pocket money, buy what you like' without the parents bering derisive because the child made 'the wrong' choices, letting them choose their own clothes (while drawing lines about what's appropriate to wear when).

And I think the going out in the snow was very wise of you - instead of fighting the same battle over and over, you simply put yourselves in a situation where you a) didn't have to fight and b) got what you wanted. That sounds like awesome parenting to me!
msagara
Jun. 15th, 2011 02:26 am (UTC)
And I think the going out in the snow was very wise of you - instead of fighting the same battle over and over, you simply put yourselves in a situation where you a) didn't have to fight and b) got what you wanted. That sounds like awesome parenting to me!

We thought it was a good work around, but I'm not kidding about the little old Greek ladies. On the other hand, while they gave me the most disapproving glares imaginable, they didn't actually say anything to me, the mother; they had plenty to say to my husband, if I wasn't with him, though.

I think it's just an offshoot of "choose your battles", and the coat-fight, like any fight started in the house, could continue for hours - which is to say, he was obviously very small and we could force him into the coat, but by that point he was so upset he just didn't stop.
green_knight
Jun. 15th, 2011 10:43 am (UTC)
I can imagine the looks and the disapproval. And I suppose, without knowing the circumstances, I would have looked a little askance as well if I'd happened to come across the situation.

When you're dealing with horses (and I suppose dogs as well), there are many people who say that you should never ever give in, because once you do, you'll always lose. My experience has been different, and I think most people underestimate the degree to which a horse will remember that there was a fight and they had a chance of winning, rather than 'who won'. By channeling the behaviour into something else, or finding workarounds, you're actually supporting your position much better.

(Also: prevention of meltdown = enabling him to learn better, which makes your strategy more of a win.)
lyssabits
Jun. 14th, 2011 07:58 pm (UTC)
The bit about the old Greek ladies cracks me up, I endure the same from Chinese women of all ages, especially my mother in law. But over socks, of all things, in the Bay Area. I'll grant you, it's chilly around here... for values of chilly that would make anyone who lives in a climate with snow laugh their asses off. Jonas is barely 14 months old but people have been giving me crap for not dressing him in socks and shoes from the beginning. The fact that we've never been able to keep anything on his feet for more than 5 seconds since he gained the ability to grab things doesn't seem to impress anyone. My kid gets sweaty wearing long sleeves in temperatures that have me wearing two shirts and a sweatshirt, but everyone assumes he's freezing all the time. I don't endure it with grace. =P
msagara
Jun. 15th, 2011 02:34 am (UTC)
My kid gets sweaty wearing long sleeves in temperatures that have me wearing two shirts and a sweatshirt, but everyone assumes he's freezing all the time.

Mine was like that - but it made me remember all the times my mother used to make us wear sweaters when we were dying of heat because *she* was cold... so I tried to be good.
spiffikins
May. 26th, 2012 06:58 pm (UTC)
My mother did this for years - once we grew up she started admitting it - she'd look at our bare feet and say "put some socks on - my feet are cold just *looking* at you"

(Anonymous)
Jun. 15th, 2011 05:39 pm (UTC)
structured vs. predictable
wjr's wife here, pardon the "anonymity" ;-)

Our school district has a "structured" assumption...if someone with ASD is having problems in our school (a parent participation, project based, developmental one), then its because they need more structure, not services. So, in one case (not my kid) a child got denied an aide at our school and instead got moved to a more structured school, on the assumption that all he needed was more structure. Needless to say, it was worse there, and he got an aide. Shame they had to rip him away to another school to determine that our teachers suggestion of an aide was correct.

Our K teacher stressed that ours needed a *predictable and flexible* environment, not a structured one, and in the last few years I've seen how right she is. He has the same need for control over his environment as yours does, and if he were put in a structured environment he would lose all sense of control and this kid who is doing 90% great at school and needs no school services would suddenly be a problem student.

I'm stressed about the "structured" assumption as we contemplate getting ASD kid #2 into the system, with a similar desire for a "predictable but flexible" option....thinking about how to avoid the insistance upon structure by the district. She's likely to need services, so we're going to be more dependant on the district this time around.

(we also serve desert with the dinner, so they can eat it first, and hats and coats only appear if the kids determine it is cold out. the little old chinese lady was mostly miffed over the pacifier at 3.5 years old.)
(Anonymous)
Jun. 19th, 2011 04:34 pm (UTC)
raising a person
I'm an avid reader of your books, but it was only after you started writing about your son that I really got into this LiveJournal (so it's seemed to have gained you some readers =)

Your parenting methods remind me very strongly of my mother's. Most people treat children like... well. Children. But you (and my mom) treat your child like a person, with his own desires and opinions. I grew up knowing that it was okay to have (and more importantly, express) my own view of things (something that perhaps made life difficult for my mom when I was a teenager).

Unfortunately, I see too many people who forget that a child is a person and an individual, and just as many who raise their own kids (for lack of a better word) generically.

I'm not a mother yet (and I'm still debating about whether or not I want to be) but I feel like these posts are helping me to understand aspects of parenting I had never considered, and is preparing me to make a better decision as to 1)if I want to be a parent and 2)how to handle it if it ever happens.

I remember as a small child interacting with adults who treated me like an idiot, and how incredibly frustrating that was, that they didn't realise I had a brain.

Thanks for reminding everyone that a child, even as a baby, is already a person and not just a blank slate.
( 14 comments — Leave a comment )